Implications

Thinking on Telling Words
"Ultimately the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century" Dr. Micheal Denton (molecular biologist and medical doctor) Evolution: A Theory in Crisis p.358 (1985)

"In short there is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on the Earth." Sir Fred Hoyle (Noble Prize winner - mathematician and astronomer) The Intelligent Universe p.23 (1983)

"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going." Francis Crick: Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature p.88 (1981) (In 1962 Francis Crick, along with Maurice Wilkins, was awarded the Noble Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1962 for the discovery of DNA.)

"Crick is thoroughly aware of the awesome complexity of cellular life and the extreme difficulty of explaining how such life could have evolved in the time available on earth. So he … advanced a theory he called
'directed panspermia'. The basic idea is that an advanced extraterrestrial civilization, possibly facing extinction, sent primitive life forms to earth in a spaceship. The spaceship builders couldn't come themselves because of the enormous time required for interstellar travel; so they sent bacteria capable of surviving the voyage and the severe conditions that would have greeted them on arrival on the early earth … When a scientist of Crick's calibre feels he has to invoke undetectable spacemen, it's time to consider whether the field of prebiological evolution has come to a dead end." - Phillip Johnson: Darwin on Trial p.108-109

"In one of their audiovisual displays in 1980, the British Museum of Natural History included the statement that evolution was not a scientific theory in the sense that it could not be tested and refuted by experiment. This devastating characterization of evolution brought a flurry of criticism from the scientific establishment and the museum quickly removed it from the display. In any other circumstances the media would have raised the objection of 'censorship', but in this case they looked the other way."

               Luther Sunderland: Darwin's Enigma p.27 (1998)


"I suppose that nobody will deny that it is a great misfortune if an entire branch of science becomes addicted to a false theory. But this is what has happened in biology … I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science."   Søren Løvtrup - Darwinism: The Refutaion of a Myth p.422 (1987)
Søren Løvtrup a Swedish biologist and commited evolutionist rejects the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution. He maintains that mutations and natural selection have had little, if anything, to do with evolution.

"It is an unfortunate truth that fossils do not emerge from the ground with labels already attached to them. And it is bad enough that much of the labelling was done in the name of egoism … It remains inescapably true that applying the correct label is incredibly difficult … especially so when the material on which the analysis is being done is fragmentary and eroded. 'It is an incredibly difficult problem,' says Lord Zuckerman. 'It is one so difficult that I think it would be legitimate to despair that one could ever turn it into a science.'"          Roger Lewin (evolutionist and author): Bones of Contention p.27

Introduction

A Case for Creation

Astronomy

Geology

Palaeontology

Biology

Physics

Dating

Statistics

Creation

The Flood

Implications

Where does it all lead?

Other Related Sites


To contact us:

Email: questions@case-creation.org.uk